I intervened from the beginning of the debate of the text of law  social democracy and working time  yesterday evening to explain the vote of the group SRC on the exception of inadmissibility defended by my colleague Alain Vidalies.

I am part of the group of socialist deputies which is going to follow the entirety of the debate envisaged until Monday evening. We tabled 1400 amendments on the 2nd part of this text dedicated at the time of job, which, as I had opportunity to underline it in this first intervention, constitute a true  dynamiting of labour laws  , expression which was besides taken back by the daily Liberalisation of day.

Mister minister, you betrayed your word and derided at social dialogue and if this expression had not been sullied some years ago, I would say that the social partners were  deceived  . You have a social conception of dialogue at the same time selective and in variable geometry. When agreements agree you, you transpose them it was the case of the shutter suppleness of agreement on the modernisation of labour market. But you prove to be less attentive on agreement UPA, mechanisms of compensation of strenuousness or else positions concerning the gold parachutes, and you trample the social partners when their conclusions do not correspond to your ideas.